R. v. H.G.
90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition overturned after the adjudicator agreed with counsel’s submissions that the ASD “FAIL” readings were unreliable. Counsel argued
90-day Immediate Roadside Prohibition overturned after the adjudicator agreed with counsel’s submissions that the ASD “FAIL” readings were unreliable. Counsel argued
Client charged with Driving While Prohibited. After negotiations with Crown, charge reduced to lesser and included offence of failing to
Client received a 90-Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) after blowing two “FAIL” readings. IRP overturned after the adjudicator agreed with defence counsel’s
Client charged with impaired driving and driving with a blood alcohol level over .08. Criminal charges dropped and client entered
Client charged with several property and driving offences including dangerous operation and driving while prohibited. Defence counsel negotiated with Crown
Client charged with Impaired Driving and Driving over .08 after causing a four car collision. The Client was arrested at
Client received a 90-Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition (“IRP”) after blowing two “FAIL” readings. IRP overturned after the adjudicator agreed with defence counsel’s
Client was charged with impaired and dangerous driving after various witnesses observed the him driving erratically, ultimately colliding with a telephone
Client charged with several property and driving offences including dangerous operation and driving while prohibited. Defence counsel negotiated with Crown
For close to 30 years, Stern Shapray has been a pillar of trusted criminal defence in British Columbia. We’ve earned a reputation for professionalism, success, and results—inside and outside the courtroom.
Copyright © 2025 sternshapraylaw.ca | Design and Developed by SocialEyes Communications