R. v. J.T.
Client charged with Driving While Prohibited. Charge reduced to lesser and included offence of not having a driver’s license. – NO
Client charged with Driving While Prohibited. Charge reduced to lesser and included offence of not having a driver’s license. – NO
Charges of Driving While Prohibited reduced to Driving Without a Drivers License under the Motor Vehicle Act resulting in a reduction from a
Client charged with excessive speeding. We resolved the case with a plea as a Registered Owner instead of as a
We were successful on the challenge to this 90 Day Driving Prohibition where the client blew a fail reading on
Successful challenge to 90 Day IRP in case involving an issue about the identity of the driver of the vehicle.
90 Day driving prohibition involving allegation of refusal to provide a breath sample at the roadside. Factual challenge to the
Impaired driving charges withdrawn and client entered a plea under section 144 of the Motor Vehicle Act to driving without
Impaired driving charges in case involving a one car accident dropped with plea to offence under section 144 of the
Impaired driving charges dropped by prosecutor after pre-trial discussions regarding numerous issues in the case. – NO CRIMINAL RECORD
For close to 30 years, Stern Shapray has been a pillar of trusted criminal defence in British Columbia. We’ve earned a reputation for professionalism, success, and results—inside and outside the courtroom.
Copyright © 2025 sternshapraylaw.ca | Design and Developed by SocialEyes Communications